Expected learning outcomes
Understanding different perspectives taken with regards to information on the digital object.
What is the target audience?
Professionals and prospective professionals in the field of data curation, repository management and digital preservation.
Producers/depositors of digital content.
Researchers exploring solutions for data management and digital preservation
Teachers/trainers in this field
Solution providers for organisations in demand of solutions for data / repository management and digital preservation
Level of advancement/ prerequisites
Basic understanding of metadata and cataloguing
Significant Properties (SP)
Time required for completion30 min reading
CCSDS, J. (2012). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). CCSDS 650.0- M-2, Magenta Book.
Chowdhury, G. (2010). From digital libraries to digital preservation research: the importance of users and context. Journal of documentation, 66(2), 207-223.
Corubolo, F., Eggers, A-G., Waddington, S., Hasan, A., Kontopoulos, E., Hedges, M., Darányi, S. (2014). Initial Version of Environment Information Extraction Tools (Deliverable 4.1 of the PERICLES project).
Dappert, A., & Farquhar, A. (2009). Significance is in the eye of the stakeholder. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, 297-308. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Dappert, A., Peyrard, S., Chou, C. C., & Delve, J. (2013). Describing and Preserving Digital Object Environments. New Review of Information Networking, 18(2), 106-173.
DCC Digital Curation Centre. (2013). List of Metadata Standards | Retrieved June 30, 2014, from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/metadatastandards/list.
Falcão, P. (2010). Developing a Risk Assessment Tool for the conservation of software-based artworks. MA thesis, BFH: Hochschule fuer Kuenste Bern.
Hedstrom, M., & Lee, C. A. (2002). Significant properties of digital objects: definitions, applications, implications. Proceedings of the DLM-Forum (Vol. 200, pp. 218-27).
Kari, J., & Savolainen, R. (2007). Relationships between information seeking and context: A qualitative study of Internet searching and the goals of personal development. Library & Information Science Research, 29(1), 47-69.
Knight, G. (2008). Deciding factors: Issues that influence decision-making on significant properties. JISC. Retrieved January, 7, 2010.
Knight, G. 2010. Significant Properties Data Dictionary. InSPECT project report. Arts and Humanities Data Service/The National Archives. At http://www.significantproperties.org.uk/sigprop-dictionary.pdf.
Laurenson, P. (2014). Old media, new media? Significant difference and the conservation of software-based art.In Graham, B. (Ed.) New Collecting: Exhibiting and Audiencesafter New Media Art. Chapter 3. University of Sunderland, UK.
Lurk, T. (2008, January). Virtualisation as conservation measure. In Archiving Conference (Vol. 2008, No. 1, pp. 221-225). Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
Lynch, C. (1999). Canonicalization: A fundamental tool to facilitate preservation and management of digital information. D-Lib Magazine, 5(9).
Oxford dictionary (2013). Context: definition of context in Oxford dictionary (British … Retrieved June 30, 2014, from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/context.
PREMIS Editorial Committee. (2008). PREMIS data dictionary for preservation metadata, version 2.0. Retrieved June, 13, 2008. Chicago.
N. I. S. O. (2004). National Information Standards Organization. Understanding Metadata.
Tonkin, E. (2015), Semi-automated metadata extraction in the long term.
Schenk, A. and Russell, P. (2011). Metadata harvesting and the OAI-PMH.